The one real problem I have with the whole Scott Peterson trial is the fact that I have to hear about it on a nightly basis on the national news. Why?!?

I understand it’s a pretty bad crime when a guy kills his pregnant wife, but why is this national news? Shouldn’t they be airing news that applies to all of us? Maybe instead of an hour special on this shit, they could air something like all the shitty things our president is doing or all the corruption in every part of the political system which cost people jobs and education.
This is worthy of a top story? Yea, a LOCAL one, not a national story. You can’t tell me there is something that is more important to be showing on a national level than some piece of shit that kills his wife and kid.

What impact does this trial have on us has a nation? Absolutely fucking none, that’s what. The reason this is on the news it that it feeds into that soap opera bullshit people seem to really care about. It gives the people who have that false sense of concern about other people they don’t know, never met, didn’t have any idea they even excised until they seen this on the news, then all of the sudden that instant feeling of care and sorrow gets kicked in.

It’d be nice to see real news on the news, and not glorified local stories there to hide what we should be seeing.

Comments
on Nov 15, 2004
What impact does this trial have on us has a nation?


I agree that Peterson is simply one among many who killed their spouse last year. However, rather than asking why we are paying so much attention to this particular case, I think we should ask why we are silent about the deaths of all the other women. National outrage at these crimes should be common place.

It’d be nice to see real news on the news, and not glorified local stories there to hide what we should be seeing.


Just for the record, Domestic Violence is real news, happening to real people. In fact, I would wage a bet that you know at least one victim of domestic violence, as it is THAT common.

I understand the point that you are making, but while making your point, try not to belittle victims of this real and serious crime.
on Nov 15, 2004
There's nothing belittling about it, and domestic violence is a pretty bad thing, but that hasn't been the real issue with this case, infact this case hardly has anything to do with domestic violence. I don't remember hearing anything about him beating her or any shit like that. He just flat out killed her out of the blue probably because he didn't want to be with her, and had no concern at all about his kid so he just killed her, and since he's rich he figured he could get away with it since most of them do.

This is a murder, not a domestic violence case.
on Nov 15, 2004
I'll agree with you, the media does seem to focus on a handful of story and run them way too much. Not to say what happened in the peterson case was a good thing, but there has to be more new out there. Even if that news ends up telling us all the people that killed their spouses (as shadesofgrey mentioned), at least it would make for a more informed big picture.
on Nov 16, 2004
This is a murder, not a domestic violence case


Sorry, it is actually a domestic violence homocide, as defined by domestic violence laws.
on Nov 21, 2004
The media loves a human interest story...if it's happy, slap it onto the end of the news to make us all feel good! If it's a tragedy...latch onto it and suck it's blood for all it's worth. Get a corporate sponsor! Tragedy sells. Airtime is time to sell things to people. It's all entertainment baby...the Peterson case is a local story that made the bigtime. The hometown story that hit it big! Stay tuned...more anguish and fear after we tell you how to whiten your teeth. Next on the menu: the book and the T.V. movie based upon the book based upon the story based upon actual events.

This comment has been brought to you by Time Warner...
on Nov 21, 2004
why is this national news?


I think it partly has to do with the passing of "Connor's Law." My understanding....this is the first time in Modesto County that someone could be accountable of a double homicide for the killing of a pregnant woman.
on Nov 21, 2004
I agree with shades completely. The thing is, drawing attention to cases like this one helps raise public awareness, and I think that's a good thing.

Plus, being a compassionate person, once I have been alerted to something like this, I am interested in seeing the full story, and have no objection to further coverage or updates.

We should be angry . . . but not at the media for wasting our time with a story that didn't happen on our street, but that women are being abused and murdered all over the country.

BTW -- I'd be interested to know what recent events you would deem newsworthy.
on Nov 21, 2004
We should be angry . . . but not at the media for wasting our time with a story that didn't happen on our street, but that women are being abused and murdered all over the country.


Exactly, Tex. Good comment.